![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Topic ClosedGo ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() |
"I WANT THAT KNIFE " |
thanx jesse........... old pics are always good to look at.......well it seems the afo was quite popular to alot of knife makers. <--------------------<<<< >>>>--------------------> DO NOT TRUST YOUR LIFE TO A POS CHARTER MEMBER #1 LUM LUNATICS | |||
|
"I WANT THAT KNIFE " |
ooo another thing a retail price of $200,plus the ugly monarch........... <--------------------<<<< >>>>--------------------> DO NOT TRUST YOUR LIFE TO A POS CHARTER MEMBER #1 LUM LUNATICS | |||
|
Forumite |
you're welcome. funny how the price hasn't changed much in 18 years. _______________ - Jesse. The 520 needs an M4 blade. | |||
|
Power Forumite ![]() |
Just got my first AFO and ill i can say is WOW Its built like a tank and it fire HARD, the finest auto ive ever owned/handled Boomerangs 'n Butterflies: An Osborne Alliance | Member #3 | |||
|
| "I find your lack of faith disturbing." |
Just curious.... How's it better than the 9100 auto Stryker? I always thought that was benchmade's best out the side auto Thanks for your opinion! "I see you have constructed a new lightsaber." | |||
|
Power Forumite ![]() |
I have both and my reason i like the afo better is because its handles are beefier, like the blade style better than the tanto, and the grip is more comfortable. The 9100 carries better in the pocket but I feel that the afo is built tougher. Im not dis(ing) the 9100 but I think the afo is better. Boomerangs 'n Butterflies: An Osborne Alliance | Member #3 | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed
